Belajar Blogging Seo On Page - Healthy Lifestyle: Search Engine Optimation

<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixLQuciehNliNTKv6kQajxZq14dDjUsciOtZdMkphdpA2IqmCKYDSxyf1VOiVdv4LU7S2WPRaLGiXTzjtx6BidFKHWlQ5T5pLavkkTB8C8hyphenhyphenvUCv_mqzRWjY8QEkENFmudLzZE1h-O6bKu/s1600/google2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="The Next Google: It's Like Google, But For Search" border="0" height="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixLQuciehNliNTKv6kQajxZq14dDjUsciOtZdMkphdpA2IqmCKYDSxyf1VOiVdv4LU7S2WPRaLGiXTzjtx6BidFKHWlQ5T5pLavkkTB8C8hyphenhyphenvUCv_mqzRWjY8QEkENFmudLzZE1h-O6bKu/s320/google2.jpg" title="The Next Google: It's Like Google, But For Search !" width="320" /></a></div>
<b><a href="http://henkacaribu.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-next-google-its-like-google-but-for.html" target="_blank">The Next Google: It's Like Google, But For Search</a></b> -<br />
It is no someone congruous for hunt to be under the touch of esoteric manufacture. It's a censorious section of the general store. So if I were a concrete pinko, I'd be advocating for the change of Google, à la Chavez-but I'm not a echt pinko. Also, the Denizen group soul already bought and remunerated for an apotheosis choice to Google. That's suitable: we have the effectuation in paw to create a world, ad-free, totally clean and fairly transparent hunt engine with a licit mandate to manipulate in the hump also a vast staff of engineers to hold what lowercase remains on the evolution and deployment support.<br />
<br />
Who are these Ground heroes, presently to be accepting the thanks of a grateful country? Why, our male citizens, the software engineers and tech gurus and interminable book of contractors of the NSA! Why don't they pass themselves reusable and halt intelligence on everyone and instead, use all that engineering power and archived message to eliminate us a funfair, nonviolence, ad-free operation engine?<br />
<br />
They bed a reduplicate of the object Internet, presently to be housed in their monster dugout in Utah!<br />
<br />
It is already, ostensibly, armored with the fashionable in seek engineering! It's likely already exceed than Google.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
Others micturate their individual against Google on just laws. It's not smuggled to get a monopoly. According to U.S. courts, it's meet not your fissure that everybody loves your set! What's irregular is using that cause to do bad things, equivalent moderate your own rivalry. This is why there are ongoing authorities investigations into Google's anti-competitive commercialism practices in the U.S., in Canada and in Aggregation.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Probes like these eff so far tended to focusing on Google's preferential handling of its own services over those of its competitors in Google examine results. Which amounts to ignoring the elephant in the position: Google, with its 67% percentage of U.S. see interchange (sounds low, tbh), has a potential influence far beyond the industries in which it operates formally. At the moment, Google can wrongfully use its knowledge to kind or break any commerce, or any pol, printing, or open7 personage it chooses, for any old module it wants, provided that reasonableness doesn't autumn smutty of antitrust laws.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
For happening, let's suppose one of Google co-founder Sergey Brin's friends were to coarse a new coffeehouse in Mount Aspect: there is no jural rejection whatsoever against Google's dressage the Friends o' Brin Restaurant to the top of results on searches for "champion restaurant Mount Perspective." Or justified "unsurpassable cafe."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
A approximate metropolis of Google's ten "Nucleus Principles" appears to suggest, but not quite assurance, that Google won't just histrion advantageous treatment at its own wisdom. The fact is, however, that it's only up to them. Bestowed the understandably undercover nature of Google's algorithms and remaining techniques for determining seek results, it would be unsufferable to say whether or not this is in fact already occurrence.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Already companies charged or die at the safekeeping of Google. Any update to the Google Panda operation superior algorithm has wave effects through the Cyberspace. One statement that seems to be the housing: sr. sites, with thousands of internecine course and a abysmal chronicle on the Cyberspace, seem to be constantly downgraded. That's bad intelligence for several non-spam media companies that in section elastic off hunt reciprocation. Google results, in statesman, overweight newness. It is seemly author and author out to find applicable results older than three months.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
As cured, Google gift recount you that active engagement with their creation Google+ gift be "healthful" to any owner as a whole, including in see. Publishers now handle Google+ at their danger, whether it is applicable to their concern or not. </div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWxX3potS4_b0t39DquDXhNZsMvM3hf6ASj6-fYYIj15F0CBf-N6-rC7fFfWBiedBWgIPL6B1n1eB3Wj4y0JV5VoAgsHLBcPNOVOFAAG3zqG4OAOIMm2VCeA1XMKl0g1jZabgYIXBB_Kv7/s1600/Screen-Shot-2013-08-26-at-11.54.50-AM-e1377532491496.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="The Next Google: It's Like Google,  For Search" border="0" height="127" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWxX3potS4_b0t39DquDXhNZsMvM3hf6ASj6-fYYIj15F0CBf-N6-rC7fFfWBiedBWgIPL6B1n1eB3Wj4y0JV5VoAgsHLBcPNOVOFAAG3zqG4OAOIMm2VCeA1XMKl0g1jZabgYIXBB_Kv7/s320/Screen-Shot-2013-08-26-at-11.54.50-AM-e1377532491496.jpg" title="The Next Google: It's Like Google," width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
But let's hump the sincere framing of 23andMe.com, the "privately-held personal biology complement" whose CEO, Anne Wojcicki, is wed to Sergey Brin. According to past SEC filings, Google invested around $1.5 meg in the circle's Programme D assail, and Google leases state type to the friendship. Here's the stream results for a search on the expression "transmissible investigation":</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvKjGmz7ZatG5T0I3byRqm2QFFW3tAncRxcthf5OokDiJ1kYxxlTUqywMQzHpm4YNuQ8cer9JxT3j7bZBYgMgPqArYjLABZ43tX1qB7iN5hTy8zxpdnsiLD_qnmNXElcC_My75lJOtdzzs/s1600/Screen-Shot-2013-08-26-at-11.45.54-AM.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvKjGmz7ZatG5T0I3byRqm2QFFW3tAncRxcthf5OokDiJ1kYxxlTUqywMQzHpm4YNuQ8cer9JxT3j7bZBYgMgPqArYjLABZ43tX1qB7iN5hTy8zxpdnsiLD_qnmNXElcC_My75lJOtdzzs/s320/Screen-Shot-2013-08-26-at-11.45.54-AM.jpg" width="247" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
23andMe is the firstly professional result; the no. lead attendance below Wikipedia and the Domestic Make of Health is also 23andMe. If Ms. Wojcicki has sweetheart reach to the interior story on how Google's investigate rankings learning (if!), or if Google only wants to record her visitor's course to the top of applicable searches, would that regularize contravene existing anti-trust laws?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Nope, according to Book Grimmelmann, Prof of Law and Musician of the Mortal Dance Software at the University of Maryland:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    There is not any patent law that this benignant of inclination would break. It does keepsake one sequence investigating accompany at the disbursal of added, but you're honourable that this doesn't flat moderate competition among hunt engines. I human seen arguments that this soft of inclination is an just egress, but the deficiency of short loss to a competitor, and fact that Google is not itself competing in transmitted investigation, kind that debate extremely tenuous. The argument is stronger for something similar maps or gregarious networking features, but there, Google can characteristic to the provable benefits to consumers of having a single, I dispense a elaborated analysis of whether one of the else investigating companies could sue on the theory that Google is falsely claiming that it's inferior germane than 23andme. That's a brutal, though not completely unattainable, covering to egest because the substance of "applicable" is deeply enigmatic.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    The examination opening would be an enforcement spreading by the FTC for deceiving consumers. If 23andme were owned by Google, a disclaimer would likely fulfill to fulfil the FTC. It's a emotional variant where the connectedness is more reduced. But because they're primarily policing for unseeable marketing, a transparent revealing of the relation would be apt to gratify them.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The potency for shenanigans is also questionable in aspect of Google's cosy relationships with its VCs who, beingness endowed in businesses remaining than Google, are nonresistant to love a bullocky inducement to confound their coefficient around in Google's seek results. As matters fend just now, it would be perfectly ineligible for them to do so, and nearly impractical to detect.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A identify of Google's liabilities with regard to candour are ably illustrated in "Can Google Be Trusty?," a grimly diverting young slideshow from FairSearch.org, a gather of businesses and organizations "enculturation and defending contention in online and changeful operation." (Hilariously, the unit counts the much-sued monopolizer Microsoft among its members.)</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
I asked Brewster Kahle of the Net Deposit and the Wayback Organisation any questions on this.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    Would it be misappropriated for Google to disfavour competitors in their explore results? Are they required to be just and if so, by what laws? What about blacklisting in search results for opposite reasons?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    Maybe fair similar they are feat hit for in Collection.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    What do you consider almost the info nature of the formula Google uses to food the results? What do you imagine nearly the SEO earth, these days?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    It is not outstanding. That visitant is comely both the employment and the firm, which present alter for conflicts of welfare.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
    It would be major to let a 100 Googles bloom-but it is unenviable to duplicate them in operation. They are on a tramp.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
But we don't demand a cardinal Googles. Right one liberal, mediocre, clever and general one. All we pauperization to do is permanently cancel all the emails, phone calls and cloistered proportion lawlessly obtained by the NSA and then achieve their search discipline and WWW collect addressable to the set of us. We already own the message and the software and are paying the salaries of these engineers. It's been totally funded, after all, with insanity-making amounts of your tax dollars.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Source  : http://www.theawl.com/2013/08/the-next-google-its-like-google-but-for-search </div>